Somewhere it is said that Telekinesis is defined as “the production of motion in objects without contact or other physical means.”
Having quoted that, it aptly refers to an incident that I experienced two days ago. I shall relate what happened.
A chat between Windy and I on Yahoo Messenger was temporarily put on hold. When it was resumed, in came Windy or shall I rather say in came the Fury of Windy.
He was fuming mad about having a unannounced visit by his Insurance Agent that night. As I understood it, the Insurance Agent needed Windy to sign another set of documents to acknowledge that the official Insurance Forms were incorrectly answered.
According to Windy, the Insurance Forms were not filled by him but by his Agent and he (Windy) had to sign the acknowledgment papers as though he had made false declarations.
I could then see why Windy was so upset. I’ve known him to be precise in what he says and does. And he never fails to deliver.
While Windy was fuming at his nostrils and ears with smoke, ranting about the audacity of the Insurance Agent….
All of a sudden my computer stalled and my monitor went totally black. I had to switch my Computer back on. This has never happened to my Computer unless there is a power failure and what it does to my computer would need no explanation.
Gosh! the Fury of Windy appears to be more potent than computer hackers! I’d call that Telekinesis.
General Santos Time
1 Comments
November 27th, 2009 at 8:23 am
The reason why he would need to re-sign the documents is to confirm that he agreed with what was written. If the documents were wrong and he made an insurance claim, the insurance company could have declared that they were void and refuse to pay up. Any documents that are legally required to carry a person's signature are a declaration that everything on them is true. If at a later date it is found that just one point on the document is not accurate then it is in layman's terms 'a wriggle out clause.'
For instance: If on a house contents insurance a person declares that they have locks on all windows and doors – in the small print it usually refers to specific locks, often the types of locks found on double-glazing. If a property was an older building with perhaps wooden window frames and what is considered as an old-fashioned locking system on a bottom bar (only the bar can be locked down) then if they declare that they have locking windows and make an insurance claim after a break-in by a burglar – their claim would most probably be declared VOID. This is because usually only modern window and door locking systems are considered to be safe.
So if an Insurance Policy Document would need to be amended if someone say had declared that a house had window and door locks and they were not modern. A new signature would need to be gained for the document to then be legal and for the householder to be covered in cases of break-in.
This applies with so many things but especially Insurance Documents – they are a minefield and need to be read and gone through with great accuracy or when making a claim their would not be any pay-out on behalf of the Insurance Company.
Phew!!!!!!
As time consuming as it may be it pays everyone to read through any forms two or more times to make sure that the information provided is accurate. Remember also to read through the small print and for those who may not be sure – get a second opinion and on really complicated forms possibly a third!
[Reply]